EESemi.com Forum Archives
Analyzing
Open Pins Caused by a Wirebonding Problem
Open pins
caused by wirebonding problems are
commonly encountered in the Failure Analysis
(FA) lab. The archived forum thread below discusses the typical FA
considerations when dealing with this failure mechanism. These
considerations include being able to assess if the
bond lifting failures are due to poor
intermetallic formation and if so, what could have caused such a problem
to arise. EDX analysis is a common
tool used for detecting contaminants on the bond pads that could hamper
good intermetallic formation.
Posted by Sadoc: Thu
Dec 07, 2006 9:22 pm Post
subject: FA for open issue |
|
hello all:
I have some question for the fail mode for IC open
issure.
The fail mode as below:
1.under the x- ray , no abnormal be observed. Gold ball
still on the pad,
and wire weep is ok. But in fact , the IC is open.
2.after decap for the ball shear test or the neck pull
test, it always fail
pull value is nearly zero,same with shear.
Could anyone tell me why? |
|
|
Posted by FARel Engr:
Thu Dec 07, 2006 10:08 pm
Post subject: |
|
Hi Sadoc,
Can you please describe the intermetallic coverage (IMC)
on the affected bond pads? If the IMC's are
insufficient, then you likely have a contam on the
surface of your bond pads that prevents good
intermetallic formation. If so, you need to have the
bond pads analyzed with EDX to determine the nature of
the contaminants.
Good Luck!
FARel Engr |
|
|
Posted by Sadoc: Thu
Dec 07, 2006 10:40 pm Post
subject: |
|
Thanks for your reply.
OK, well i don't really sure the IMC percentage, but
there are some au-al left on the pad, i guess may be for
70% or higher.
I can show you the EDX atomic confirm result
1.test on the left gold area ,C
29.51%,O:32.67%,AL:10.43%,AU:27.39%
2.test on the pad
,C:20.46%,O:4.71%,AL:67.56%,Si:2.83%,Ti:2.44%
SO, how about the O good or bad for the bondability?
and the how about the C, is it show up for the normal or
abnormal? |
|
|
Posted by FARel Engr:
Thu Dec 14, 2006 10:01 pm
Post subject: |
|
Hi Sadoc,
If 70% IMC is left on the bond pad, then that means you
have very good intermetallic formation, so surface
contam may not be your issue. You must then ask yourself
why the bonds are lifting even if the IMC's are so good.
Is there a possibility that you've overbonded them?
The high % of C and O are a bit abnormal. Also, if you
are detecting the Ti metal under the bond pad, then you
are doing the EDX analysis at a very high EHT. Please do
the EDX analysis at a much lower EHT, say 5 keV so that
what you'll get are data from the surface of the bond
pad, and nowhere else. Do the EDX analysis at 10 keV as
well for comparison.
BTW, what is your bond pad metal's composition? Is it
doped with Si? Why are you seeing Si in the bond pad
itself?
FARel Engr |
|
|
Posted by Logan218142:
Sat Dec 16, 2006 4:10 pm
Post subject: |
|
Hi... do we know which point you
detected 'open' fail, is this a time zero fail from SMT
line or reliability or field failure?
On PFA side, is there any SAM analysis or X-section
done? Any specific site/pads having 'open connections'
Do you observe ductile structure or micro-voids of IMC
on 'open' bonding pads? |
|
Back to the 'Best of Forums' Archives
HOME
Copyright
©
2008
EESemi.com.
All Rights Reserved. |
|
|