EESemi.com Forum Archives
Destructive Effects of IR Reflow
Infrared (IR)
Reflow is a step in Solder Heat Resistance Test
that simulates the thermal stress experienced by units when they are
mounted on boards. The archived forum thread below discusses what
IR Reflow is and its effects, and why it is used in package reliability
testing.
Posted by Jefriz:
Tue Apr 25, 2006 7:11 pm
Post subject: Destructions of IR Reflow |
|
Hello Everybody,
1) Can anybody give me more explanation why the IR
Reflow increases or induce the die crack phenomenon?
Also package crack?
2) What are the other phenomena that the IR Reflow
induce?
3) Will convection Reflow will also induce the same
phenomena? Other reflow types (if there are) will also
do the same?
4) In the usual SHRT (Precon), 3x IR Reflow is commonly
used. Why need to be 3X? Is there an industry standard
that limits an IC to be processed at reflow(SMT, rework,
SMT)?
5) Is the heat from oven will induce the same
destructive strength as with Reflow?
6) Is 3X Reflow (IR) destructive to molded IC? Can this
be used in production screening for Die/Package crack
and still can be ship to customers (electrical pass)?
Thanks in advance for your time.
Jefriz (Pinoy in Taiwan) ~_~ |
|
|
Posted by FARel Engr:
Wed Apr 26, 2006 10:15 pm
Post subject: |
|
Hi Jefriz,
1) IR Reflow vaporizes whatever internal moisture the
package has, so the water vapor exerts tremendous
thermomechanical stresses on the die and package as it
tries to escape;
2) Delamination is also a primary mechanism induced by
IR reflow - delam can lead to corrosion, package
cracking, neck breaks, and even bond lifting;
3) yes, as long as the correct temp profile is achieved;
4) this is to simulate the worst-case scenario wherein a
device is subjected to the board mounting process 3
times during board assembly (either to multiple pass
requirements or rework);
5) yes, as long as the correct temp profile is achieved;
in reality, however, IR Reflow has a more stable and
direct stressing effect on the package than, say, vapor
reflow;
6) it is not recommended to use 3X IR reflow as a
production screen; it definitely weakens the parts and
can result in marginal parts reaching the customer;
performing 3X IR Reflow on a good number of samples and
assessing the main population's reliability based on
this is a better alternative (wherein the stressed
samples are just scrapped). |
|
|
Posted by Jefriz: Thu
Apr 27, 2006 6:05 pm Post
subject: |
|
FARel Engr.,
Thanks for the fast and educative response.
I have some additional questions (if you may)
continue item #4 = if the package is subjected to more
than 3 times reflow, will the number of defects
increase?
New items:
7) Is there a maximum time gap in between reflow pass?
What if the third pass was done 24 hours after the
second, will the result be affected?
8) Is it needed to do moisture soak or prolong floor
life exposure before doing the (sampling) Reflow
screening (die/package crack suspected lot)?
Thanks again for your time.
Jefriz ~_~ |
|
|
Posted by FARel Engr:
Fri May 05, 2006 10:54 pm
Post subject: |
|
Jefriz
BTW, IR reflow is not a stand-alone screen - it is a
part of the SHRT, which is the standard rel test. SHRT
must always consist of a standard bake, a standard soak,
and 3X shock (e.g., IR Reflow).
FARel Engr |
|
|
Back to the 'Best of Forums' Archives
HOME
Copyright
©
2008
EESemi.com.
All Rights Reserved. |
|
|