EESemi.com Forum Archives
Molding Compound
Effects on SOIC
Delamination
Plastic-to-leadframe
delamination can be due to a multitude of causes. Usually it is
attributed to poor leadframe design or leadframe contamination issues.
Once in a while, however, the molding compound is identified as the root
cause of a delamination issue. Indeed, if the chemistry of the
molding compound is not compatible with that of the leadframe, poor
adhesion of the plastic becomes an issue once the molded units are
subjected to the mechanical stresses of the packaging operations. In the
archived forum thread below, the thread starter eventually concluded
that his SOIC delamination issue was due to the molding compound they're
using.
Posted by balam122:
Wed Aug 17, 2005 2:05 pm
Post subject: SOIC delam |
|
Hi,
Kindly clarify the following:
Is the occurrence of delam / crack effects based on
1. Mold compound strength
2. Mold compound type
for the same DFS tools / force? |
|
Posted by Beengg: Thu
Aug 18, 2005 6:11 am Post
subject: |
|
Delam is more related to adhesion
of molding compound to leadframe. Factors affecting
this: molding compound chemistry, leadframe design,
presence of contam on leadframe, package design itself,
etc.
Pkg cracking is caused by many many possible factors.
But if your TFS equipment is bad, then crack will occur
no matter what molding compound you use. So make your
set-up less stressful to pkg. |
|
Posted by Bala: Fri
Aug 19, 2005 3:34 pm Post
subject: SOIC Delamination |
|
Hi,
Basically there is no quality issue with Mold Compound
X. But when we switch to Mold Compound Y of another
vendor due to cost advantage, for the same set of Dambar
trim toolings, we face the issue of delamination induced
crack (along the package body width and along the axis
of parting line of top & bottom package) where the
degating takes place. In spite of reducing the cutting
clearance the issue is getting repeated but with very
minor defect rate. Is there any known procedure to check
a compound's "Resistance to Package crack". The Mold
parameters are quite standard and we don't see the issue
after molding.
But the same compound Y is performing well in other QSOP
Packages (smaller lead pitch) where the punch width is
lesser and the impact force in turn is lesser. |
|
Posted by Beengg: Fri
Aug 19, 2005 10:32 pm Post
subject: |
|
Bala, did your team do a qual
before releasing the new molding compound? You might
want to go back to the qual report and see why the issue
was not encountered that time. What's the difference
then and now? For example, did the toolings get worn-out
already? Bcos worn-out tools can cause delam. |
|
Posted by Guest: Mon
Aug 22, 2005 5:23 pm Post
subject: |
|
Hi Beengg,
The compound was qualified for QSOP packages and by
extension, it was qualified for SOIC packages very
recently as the package dimensions are similar and the
pin count was smaller. The problem got triggered only
recently and since the severity of the problem was high,
we increased the sample size and frequency of monitoring
and found that the issue was specific to a mold
compound.
However now, the mold compound supplier has confirmed
that it is basically a capability issue of the compound
as it is not able to withstand the cutting stress. This
compound has lesser filler content and we now plan to
switchover to improved versions of compound.
Thanks for your help.
regards,
Bala. |
|
Back to the 'Best of Forums' Archives
HOME
Copyright
©
2008
EESemi.com.
All Rights Reserved. |
|
|